The Green Party and the M3 ... what really happened in 2007?

The building of the M3 and the destruction of a priceless landscape at Tara has been the subject of much discussion since the Green Party entered government in 2007.

So what really happened, and did the Green Party sell its soul for power? These two articles might enlighten us.

The first is from "Archaeology" A publication of the Archaeological Institute of America. The link to the article is http://www.archaeology.org/online/features/tara/

The article is a damning indictment of the Greens, and shows clearly that John Gormley could have prevented the M3. It says ... "Dick Roche will not have the final word on the issue. John Gormley of the preservation-conscious Green Party recently took office as Roche's successor. He began serving on June 15, just one day after Roche's decision. According to Section 22 of the Interpretation Act of 2005, the Minister for the Environment can amend or overturn previous decisions. Gormley therefore has the power to reverse Roche's controversial decision. Curiously, Gormley does not seem terribly eager to do so.

Many speculate that both ministers are tied down by political negotiations. The two sides (FF and the Greens) subsequently entered into negotiations, ultimately deciding that Fianna Fail would stay in power, provided they granted certain concessions to the Green Party. Other Green issues, such as pollution and global warming, were apparently pushed at the expense of protecting Tara. It may therefore be the case that Gormley cannot reverse the decision without violating the contract between the two parties."


The second article is from An Irish Town Planner's Blog and can be found here http://buckplanning.blogspot.com/2007/08/phoenix-magazine-on-tara.html.

From the article ... "THE densest plume of green smoke has clouded the whole issue of the Lismullen site and the manner in which the Greens sacrificed the henge site along the M3 motorway in order to get into coalition government with FF. In recent weeks, newly appointed Minister for the environment and Green Party leader, John Gormley, has announced a series of initiatives on Lismullen and the M3 which have served to divert attention from his party’s abandonment of Lismullen during negotiations with Fianna Fail last month.

The fact is that the Green negotiators – Gormley, Dan Boyle and Green general secretary, Dan Geoghegan, were fully aware that the order was due to be signed by the then incumbent environment minister, Dick Roche, but they failed to even request that it be deferred, much less make it a serious issue for negotiation. However, the immediate political fall-out from the decision was reduced, with the bungling assistance of the Dail Opposition and to the immense relief of Gormley, to a question of whether or not Gormley had the legal power to reverse the decision. Since then, Gormley has announced a series of initiatives on Lismullen – release of the departmental file; a review of how the state can protect its heritage and landscape; discussions with transport minister, Noel Dempsey, on how to minimise the visual impact of the M3; possible review of the 2004 National Monuments Act and so on – all of which has covered over, like some heavy landfill operation, the Greens participation in the burial of Lismullen in the first place.

Gormley stated on June 14 that he had not been aware that Roche had intended to sign the order – signed on June 12, the same day that the Greens agreed a government programme with FF but not announced until after the party had voted to endorse the agreement – while coalition talks with FF were drawing to a close. Boyle was only slightly more forthcoming on RTE’s Prime Time programme, also on June 14, when he said that “ we were aware that the decision was likely to be made; we weren’t told when it was going to be made”.

The very best that can be said for the Green negotiators, therefore, is that they knew the decision was pending but that they did not bother to clarify when or to whom, ie, FF or the Greens, the decision would fall . However, in an apparently unnoticed aside during RTE’s Questions and Answers programme four days later, one of the FF coalition negotiators, Noel Dempsey, blew the Greens out of the water when queried by a Green member of the Save Tara Campaign in the audience who appeared to believe that not many people knew that the particular decision on Lismullen was imminent. Dempsey stated that any reader of The Irish Times would have known that the Lismullen issue was a live one to which the Green member said: “What I’m referring to is Minister Roche’s decision; the timing of that decision and whether it was known to the negotiators”. Dempsey replied “Yes”, and the visibly shocked Green stated that this was “most certainly not” relayed to the party membership when they discussed and voted on the coalition agreement a day later. Goldhawk has also established that Roche, badgered by his departmental officials to sign the order, was in constant touch with Dempsey during the coalition negotiations to remind him of this ticking bombshell and the urgency for clarification of the issue. Dempsey was able to tell Roche that both sides of the negotiations were aware of the matter and that there was no problem in signing the order."

You can make up your own mind ... the articles clearly indicate to me that John Gormley could have stopped the M3 in its tracks.